<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snowclonelet composites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/</link>
	<description>A blog mostly about language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: X porn &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/#comment-21431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[X porn &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-21431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] porn, book porn, house porn, and real estate porn, none of which refer to actual pornography. From my 2009 posting on snowclonelet composites: Since it just came up on ADS-L with reference to “X porn” (in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] porn, book porn, house porn, and real estate porn, none of which refer to actual pornography. From my 2009 posting on snowclonelet composites: Since it just came up on ADS-L with reference to “X porn” (in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doing X &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/#comment-18909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[doing X &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-18909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] drag queen, which OED2 has from 1941 (George Legman) on; on the X queen snowclonelet, see here; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] drag queen, which OED2 has from 1941 (George Legman) on; on the X queen snowclonelet, see here; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X fag &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/#comment-5749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[X fag &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-5749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] but not further discussed, in my &#8220;Snowclonelet composites&#8221; posting from 2009: X fag (roughly &#8216;X fan, X enthusiast&#8217;), which I became aware of back in 2008 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but not further discussed, in my &#8220;Snowclonelet composites&#8221; posting from 2009: X fag (roughly &#8216;X fan, X enthusiast&#8217;), which I became aware of back in 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X Nazi &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[X Nazi &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#39;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-1746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (from my posting here). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (from my posting here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drag &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drag &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#39;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-1673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is a use of drag (OED2: &#8216;feminine attire worn by a man&#8217;) in a snowclonelet pattern X drag, conveying roughly &#8216;attire appropriate for/to X&#8217; (OED2 glosses this use [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a use of drag (OED2: &#8216;feminine attire worn by a man&#8217;) in a snowclonelet pattern X drag, conveying roughly &#8216;attire appropriate for/to X&#8217; (OED2 glosses this use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X magnet &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[X magnet &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#39;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-1668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] X magnet pattern for &#8217;someone or something that attracts Xs&#8217; is a snowclonelet, the model for which might have been chick/babe magnet, used to refer to someone (a guy, or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] X magnet pattern for &#8217;someone or something that attracts Xs&#8217; is a snowclonelet, the model for which might have been chick/babe magnet, used to refer to someone (a guy, or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twitter tweet &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[twitter tweet &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#39;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-1628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] with twitter as their first element. Some of them fall right in with known types of &#8220;snowclonelet composites&#8220;: twitter fag, twitter whore. Others are possible candidates for new types: twitter wank, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with twitter as their first element. Some of them fall right in with known types of &#8220;snowclonelet composites&#8220;: twitter fag, twitter whore. Others are possible candidates for new types: twitter wank, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hsknotes</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hsknotes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[on the airplane today I saw one I&#039;ve never seen before, 

&#039;miles fairy&#039; where &#039;miles&#039; was being replacing &#039;tooth&#039;. 

It was an ad encouraging people to donate their frequent flier miles to charity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on the airplane today I saw one I&#8217;ve never seen before, </p>
<p>&#8216;miles fairy&#8217; where &#8216;miles&#8217; was being replacing &#8216;tooth&#8217;. </p>
<p>It was an ad encouraging people to donate their frequent flier miles to charity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hsknotes</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hsknotes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aside from &#039;rage&#039;, all the other ones appear to related to sex. Is there something to that? I can&#039;t think of any other ones myself, other than &#039;complex&#039;, which I&#039;m not sure totally works. &#039;complex&#039;&#039;s snowclone couplet usage itself seems to stem from the original uses which were themselves related to sex (Oedipus complex, Electra complex). The online etymological dictionary pins the beginning of this psychological noun usage of complex at Jung in 1907. Nowadays, as was probably Jung&#039;s intention, we use suffix it to tons of things.

You complained on language log about some commenter and said you could just come here and post, but you have comments open here as well! Why not moderate comments on both places and not let things bother you so much? I&#039;ve ran into this problem a few times where I myself have offended people and I&#039;ve just learned that people my age (maybe under 30?) are really very often shocked when other people get so taken aback by comments that were never intended to offend. I think to many of us the internet is a very unreal place, so we find it odd that people have such strong emotional reactions. Actual human interaction moderates and allows two parties to negotiate an act of comment/criticism in ways that can&#039;t be done online (or aren&#039;t done due to laziness/the wish to save time), so many have adapted by not taking things too seriously.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from &#8216;rage&#8217;, all the other ones appear to related to sex. Is there something to that? I can&#8217;t think of any other ones myself, other than &#8216;complex&#8217;, which I&#8217;m not sure totally works. &#8216;complex&#8221;s snowclone couplet usage itself seems to stem from the original uses which were themselves related to sex (Oedipus complex, Electra complex). The online etymological dictionary pins the beginning of this psychological noun usage of complex at Jung in 1907. Nowadays, as was probably Jung&#8217;s intention, we use suffix it to tons of things.</p>
<p>You complained on language log about some commenter and said you could just come here and post, but you have comments open here as well! Why not moderate comments on both places and not let things bother you so much? I&#8217;ve ran into this problem a few times where I myself have offended people and I&#8217;ve just learned that people my age (maybe under 30?) are really very often shocked when other people get so taken aback by comments that were never intended to offend. I think to many of us the internet is a very unreal place, so we find it odd that people have such strong emotional reactions. Actual human interaction moderates and allows two parties to negotiate an act of comment/criticism in ways that can&#8217;t be done online (or aren&#8217;t done due to laziness/the wish to save time), so many have adapted by not taking things too seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mollymooly</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/snowclonelet-composites/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mollymooly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;X fag&quot; calls to mind &quot;X hag&quot;, X = bag, drag, stag; can&#039;t think of non-rhyming compounds for it, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;X fag&#8221; calls to mind &#8220;X hag&#8221;, X = bag, drag, stag; can&#8217;t think of non-rhyming compounds for it, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
