<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT taboo avoidance fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/nyt-taboo-avoidance-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/nyt-taboo-avoidance-fail/</link>
	<description>A blog mostly about language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:51:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of Language Blog Roundup 2012 &#124; Wordnik</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/nyt-taboo-avoidance-fail/#comment-43375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Best of Language Blog Roundup 2012 &#124; Wordnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=11506#comment-43375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] noun cocksuckers as “Offensive Adjective Inappropriate for Family Newspaper.” As Arnold Zwicky wrote, “Adjective, noun, who really cares?” The NYT then refused to print the name of the website, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noun cocksuckers as “Offensive Adjective Inappropriate for Family Newspaper.” As Arnold Zwicky wrote, “Adjective, noun, who really cares?” The NYT then refused to print the name of the website, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adjectives &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/nyt-taboo-avoidance-fail/#comment-30830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adjectives &#171; Arnold Zwicky&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=11506#comment-30830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I was reminded of the NYT&#8216;s use of adjective to refer to the word cocksuckers, reported on here. I&#8217;m beginning to understand what&#8217;s going on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was reminded of the NYT&#8216;s use of adjective to refer to the word cocksuckers, reported on here. I&#8217;m beginning to understand what&#8217;s going on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#8217;s Language Blog Roundup: Mars, Olympics, and more &#124; Wordnik</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/nyt-taboo-avoidance-fail/#comment-29226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This Week&#8217;s Language Blog Roundup: Mars, Olympics, and more &#124; Wordnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=11506#comment-29226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] New York Times had some taboo avoidance fail this week, as explained by Arnold Zwicky: “Ah, that wonderful English adjective cocksuckers (in its plural form, of course, and serving as [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New York Times had some taboo avoidance fail this week, as explained by Arnold Zwicky: “Ah, that wonderful English adjective cocksuckers (in its plural form, of course, and serving as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arnold zwicky</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/nyt-taboo-avoidance-fail/#comment-28376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arnold zwicky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=11506#comment-28376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In e-mail, Larry Horn comments waggishly on my suggested out-of-quotes paraphrase:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Not specific enough. I&#039;d have gone for

“…  and newly arrived immigrants who do not seek attention like you” fellators.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In e-mail, Larry Horn comments waggishly on my suggested out-of-quotes paraphrase:</p>
<blockquote><p>Not specific enough. I&#8217;d have gone for</p>
<p>“…  and newly arrived immigrants who do not seek attention like you” fellators.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
