<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not mentioning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/not-mentioning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/not-mentioning/</link>
	<description>A blog mostly about language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/not-mentioning/#comment-35954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[m]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=11807#comment-35954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Queen Mother was rumored to have made one sort-of acknowledgement -- from a review of a bio: 

&quot;Ah, yes - the drinks. Apart from the hats, the gin is perhaps what we most closely associate with the smiling Queen Mother. A vulgar but inquiring mind has to ask, is there any truth to the story she once yelled to her gay footmen, &#039;Would one of you old queens get this old queen a drink?&#039;&quot;
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/new-biography-of-queen-mother-is-dirt-free/article4356641/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Queen Mother was rumored to have made one sort-of acknowledgement &#8212; from a review of a bio: </p>
<p>&#8220;Ah, yes &#8211; the drinks. Apart from the hats, the gin is perhaps what we most closely associate with the smiling Queen Mother. A vulgar but inquiring mind has to ask, is there any truth to the story she once yelled to her gay footmen, &#8216;Would one of you old queens get this old queen a drink?&#8217;&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/new-biography-of-queen-mother-is-dirt-free/article4356641/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/new-biography-of-queen-mother-is-dirt-free/article4356641/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patricia</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/not-mentioning/#comment-35952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patricia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=11807#comment-35952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I&#039;m biased, but I&#039;d like to submit that the Republicans did NOT welcome all women into their tent. Rather, they embraced MOTHERS. As a single, straight female just reaching the end of my reproductive years, I don&#039;t feel like the Republicans have any use for the likes of me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;m biased, but I&#8217;d like to submit that the Republicans did NOT welcome all women into their tent. Rather, they embraced MOTHERS. As a single, straight female just reaching the end of my reproductive years, I don&#8217;t feel like the Republicans have any use for the likes of me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sissy</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/not-mentioning/#comment-35944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sissy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=11807#comment-35944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your posting on facebook was followed quick at the heels on my timeline by this video of Romney talking to a gay veteran last year  http://www.upworthy.com/mitt-romney-accidentally-confronts-a-gay-veteran-awesomeness-ensues

It&#039;s always nice when candidates in any election speak their mind openly!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your posting on facebook was followed quick at the heels on my timeline by this video of Romney talking to a gay veteran last year  <a href="http://www.upworthy.com/mitt-romney-accidentally-confronts-a-gay-veteran-awesomeness-ensues" rel="nofollow">http://www.upworthy.com/mitt-romney-accidentally-confronts-a-gay-veteran-awesomeness-ensues</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s always nice when candidates in any election speak their mind openly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arnold zwicky</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/not-mentioning/#comment-35939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arnold zwicky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=11807#comment-35939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Aric Olnes on Facebook:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Though the inclusiveness at the DNC was very evident by subtle references to &quot;standing at the altar with the one you love&quot; or &quot;not hiding who we love&quot; or relating to the repeal of DADT with statements about &quot;serving the country you love no matter who you love,&quot; the speakers at the DNC were careful not to utter the words gay or lesbian. Many speeches included comparative descriptions like rich and poor, young and old, black and white, but they often fell short of saying gay and straight. A few of the presenters were bold enough to say the words gay or lesbian, but they were in the minority. While there was no questioning that the Democrats have gone all-in on including support for LGBT issues in the 2012 platform, the indirect wording deserves some analysis.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Aric Olnes on Facebook:</p>
<blockquote><p>Though the inclusiveness at the DNC was very evident by subtle references to &#8220;standing at the altar with the one you love&#8221; or &#8220;not hiding who we love&#8221; or relating to the repeal of DADT with statements about &#8220;serving the country you love no matter who you love,&#8221; the speakers at the DNC were careful not to utter the words gay or lesbian. Many speeches included comparative descriptions like rich and poor, young and old, black and white, but they often fell short of saying gay and straight. A few of the presenters were bold enough to say the words gay or lesbian, but they were in the minority. While there was no questioning that the Democrats have gone all-in on including support for LGBT issues in the 2012 platform, the indirect wording deserves some analysis.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
