<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ink on paper vs. paint on canvas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/10/15/ink-on-paper-vs-paint-on-canvas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/10/15/ink-on-paper-vs-paint-on-canvas/</link>
	<description>A blog mostly about language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:07:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Lander</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/10/15/ink-on-paper-vs-paint-on-canvas/#comment-39060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian Lander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=12089#comment-39060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s entirely a matter of being substantial.  There&#039;s also a visual acuity issue here, at least for me.  All but the smallest of paintings are meant to be seen from a distance, so the security measures taken by museums don&#039;t generally affect my ability to see them.   This might not be true if I were educated enough to want to pick out brushstrokes and such, I realize.  But drawings are generally behind glass, often in a glass case, and you can&#039;t get very close to them.  They&#039;re also generally shown in dim rooms to preserve them.  Those two factors, and my failing eyesight, make it hard for me to see the drawings at all well, so I can&#039;t see them to the same level of detail as I can see a painting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s entirely a matter of being substantial.  There&#8217;s also a visual acuity issue here, at least for me.  All but the smallest of paintings are meant to be seen from a distance, so the security measures taken by museums don&#8217;t generally affect my ability to see them.   This might not be true if I were educated enough to want to pick out brushstrokes and such, I realize.  But drawings are generally behind glass, often in a glass case, and you can&#8217;t get very close to them.  They&#8217;re also generally shown in dim rooms to preserve them.  Those two factors, and my failing eyesight, make it hard for me to see the drawings at all well, so I can&#8217;t see them to the same level of detail as I can see a painting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
