<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: to cath (redux)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/to-cath-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/to-cath-redux/</link>
	<description>A blog mostly about language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:02:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arnold zwicky</title>
		<link>http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/to-cath-redux/#comment-40663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arnold zwicky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/?p=12219#comment-40663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Sissy SoFunk on ADS-L on the 4th:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;ve been doing healthcare in Canada for 14 years, and &quot;cathing&quot; has always been the norm in the places I&#039;ve worked.  Even in professional manuals, they would usually use &quot;catheterizing&quot; in the formal introduction to procedures, but &quot;cathing&quot; for employee guidelines.  I doubt I came across more than 15% of staff who would use anything else, and even then it would be split betweeen &quot;catheterizing&quot; and &quot;cathetering&quot;.  I worked in home-based health support, which is less formal than hospital settings, but when I was working with clients in-hospital the doctors and nurses would generally use &quot;cath&quot;, &quot;cathed&quot;, and &quot;cathing&quot; when we were talking informally.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So it seems that medical staff use &lt;i&gt;cath&lt;/i&gt; amongst themselves. Probably patients who use catheters regularly have learned the in-usage themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Sissy SoFunk on ADS-L on the 4th:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve been doing healthcare in Canada for 14 years, and &#8220;cathing&#8221; has always been the norm in the places I&#8217;ve worked.  Even in professional manuals, they would usually use &#8220;catheterizing&#8221; in the formal introduction to procedures, but &#8220;cathing&#8221; for employee guidelines.  I doubt I came across more than 15% of staff who would use anything else, and even then it would be split betweeen &#8220;catheterizing&#8221; and &#8220;cathetering&#8221;.  I worked in home-based health support, which is less formal than hospital settings, but when I was working with clients in-hospital the doctors and nurses would generally use &#8220;cath&#8221;, &#8220;cathed&#8221;, and &#8220;cathing&#8221; when we were talking informally.</p></blockquote>
<p>So it seems that medical staff use <i>cath</i> amongst themselves. Probably patients who use catheters regularly have learned the in-usage themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
