Introducing a new feature on this blog: Short Shots, brief items with little comment. This inaugural posting has five items in it.
Archive for the ‘Editing conventions’ Category
Introducing short shots
August 20, 2009Periods and type size
July 4, 2009A while back, I posted on Language Log about punctuation conventions in alphabetic abbreviations, noting that the New York Times tries to be scrupulous in the way it punctuates acronyms (which are pronounced as whole words: CAT scan) and initialisms (which are pronounced as sequences of letter names: MRI). NYT style insists on periods after each letter of an initialism (hence, M.R.I.), though with some exceptions (as in CBS), and on no periods at all in acronyms.
It seems that the New Yorker distinguishes these two types of abbreviations in the same way. But with an extra twist. From Hendrik Hertzberg’s “Talk of the Town” piece (“Stonewall Plus Forty”) in the July 6 & 13 issue (p. 24):
doma and D.A.D.T.–the Defense of Marriage Act and “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”–remain as fully in force as they were on Election Day.
Here the initialism is in ordinary caps, but the acronym is in small caps. The distinction is made, as far as I can see, throughout the magazine. A nice further touch is that initialisms that are printed without periods are also in ordinary caps rather than small caps: MTV, CNBC.
Two thousand eight
January 14, 2009The sentence went
(1) Two thousand eight was bad for the wallet, but perhaps good for the soul.
This from a posting to nytimes.com/opinion, as printed in the NYT “Op-extra” (Week in Review 1/11/09, p. 12). In it, “Two thousand eight” must be understood as referring to the year 2008. Now this is entirely comprehensible, but it might give a reader a few centiseconds of pause, as would
(2) The year two thousand eight was bad for the wallet …
It’s a style sheet thing: most editors would replace (2) by
(2′) The year 2008 was bad for the wallet …
and would absolutely not allow
(1′) 2008 was bad for the wallet …
instead of (1).
Jack/Mr. Spicer
December 25, 2008Today’s NYT has a review (by Dwight Garner) of My Vocabulary Did This to Me: The Collected Poetry of Jack Spicer (edited by Peter Gizzi and Kevin Killian; Wesleyan University Press): “Sometimes Love Lives Alongside Loneliness”. Two things: Spicer’s poetry (which will have some surprises for people who aren’t familiar with it) and the way the review refers to Spicer (and others). (more…)